Saturday , January 16 2021

Mark Zuckerberg should leave Facebook



A few weeks ago after Facebook's exposure, the tens of thousands of users' accounts impacted security, so I began to ask people in and around technology: Mark Zuckerberg on Facebook

I will not forget you. Although Zuckerberg is still working for that job, almost everyone has said that he is the only one. Workers on Facebook, former employees of the company, financial analysts, entrepreneurs, technicians, critics of critics and their vulnerable support have responded.

According to the Equation: He is the founder, executive director, president, and the most powerful shareholder of social network – he has a large portion of the company's tragic recent events, and his stand is to resolve them.

His supporters told me that Suklberg was not even able to find solutions on this issue because Sülberg had to ask only a company that he wanted to deal with this subject. But when his critics protested, Zuckerberg left his position. Barry Lynn, Executive Director of the Open Marks Institute, said that Facebook's issues started in business mode and legitimate legal vocabulary, but not the man who runs the business. Company

Facebook's 34 Facebook pages can surprise everybody without a zuckerberg. Our large technology companies do not need account. For self-interest and genius, Zuckerberg has become one of the most powerful leaders in the world. Like a Rawing Oil Company or a Misuse Food Sugar, the decisions that have been made major in the social community have gained tremendous profits.

However, because of the structure of ownership of social networks – in Zuckerberg there is 10 times more voting power than usual – that's quite common.

If we say frankly, I do not think that the corporation would be meaningful if Mark Zuckerberg was replaced by Mahatma Gandhi. "

This is a model. Over the past two decades, one of the biggest technological companies has created a system where the executives may face personal or financial consequences for a hardship. Big companies in the technology sector have been transformed into fixed components: When their corporations are doing well, they keep up their credit, they are the only heroes who can solve everything only if they are bad.

There is another way to say this: Better or worse, Zuckerberg became too big to fail.

In America, executive companies do not want their corporations to act like a punishment. (Eg 2008 Wall Street after the financial crisis).

Even corporate silence has its limit on the founders of the companies in the Silicon Valley, which honors the great universe generated by money. In the 1980s, Apple hit the Steve Jobs. Last year, Uber was like Truvazz Kalanick. Zuckerberg is also associated with his own culture.

Facebook's problems with Ubir did not reach Facebook. Facebook has been linked to a worldwide disintegration of democracy, in addition to the lack of leaks, as part of the short period of the Russian system in the presidential election of 2016.

The UN Secretary-General said that the investigation was fundamental to the genocide of Burma. This is the reason for the violence in India, South Sudan and Sri Lanka. The privacy scandal (the most recent from the Cambridge Analysis), advertising scams (discriminative ads, suspicious parameters), and federal inquiries into many of the proceedings are known to affect your mental health.

Zuckerberg has apologized and promised to redo the problems of the Facebook user, but the company's solutions often require solutions. Last week, the reporters had recently decided that political announcements would go on (Vice News had given advertising on Facebook, "United States Vice President, Mike Penns paid for them" and the Islamic State).

If you make such mistakes, another question is: Why is not Facebook penalized? In the past few months, companies that bought software have been worried over the past few months, including the co-founders of Apple, Instagram, and Okulus.

If Facebook agrees that it is a fast and culturally sensitive issue, and if it is very ideal and its culture may change, then most of the people implementing it guarantee that this will happen.

When asked about Facebook, the company argued that things are changing. Nicklag, a former deputy prime minister in the United Kingdom, considered the company's revelations seriously about the company's revelations, as director of Global Affairs.

Soccer networking was added to me on a phone with a senior Executive. He contended that he was outrageous for the leadership of Zuckerberg but he officially refused to do so. The executive explained that it would be spending more money to solve the problems of Facebook. The company hires more people to review content and may have to make further promotional plans to address its influence in the world. The executive argued that Zuckerberg's capital, the capital of Facebook, was able to bear the economic consequences of this change, rather than his employees, and better than any other leader.

This summer's share price of Facebook fell by about 20 per cent a day. This is a low income growth and an increase in operating costs. This week, social networking was a little more alert. A "Professional Executive Director," the company has suggested that the company be tempted to attempt to select the easiest solution, but not the greatest share. However, Zuckerberg had the freedom to do the right thing.

Zuckerberg's supporters have argued that he has demonstrated the ability to understand and address Facebook's problems. A few months later, the traders started trading in the stock market in the stock market in 2012. Because the money was transferred to mobile devices.

"It will take him a long time to understand the importance of the market, but when it becomes clear he understood his importance and realized how to correct it," said Don Graham, former member of the Foundation Board and former Washington Post editor. . "The company's proposal was incredibly fast, not only with a benchmark but twenty months, … We can not believe how quickly we can count on the quarterly quarter of revenue from the mobile sector."

Whether Mr. Zuckerberg still has solved his current problems. He said that in 2018 he was a personal challenge. But his culture has similar implications.

For example, let's see his offer that a new central home device, Portal last month, will not collect information about users who can use ads. Facebook's data collection system is quite widespread because he suddenly had to withdraw. Even his staff does not seem to understand this.

"I think it has failed in the past two years, and it's not responsible for its failure," said Sandy Barcilas, an old Facebook worker now working as the strategic director of the Center for Technology. Humana, an activist organization. "It is difficult to imagine that changes in the rapidly changing board of directors and shareholders in a more influential background will not be possible."

A solution for Facebook can strengthen the board of the company. Futures' Asset Management, an investment institution, has recently introduced a shareholder theme that supports a number of funds needed to be promoted to Facebook's position.

"Getting the Board of Directors is a very important structural change, so his decisions are not completely free," said Jonas Kron, Senior Vice President of Tripoli.

A Facebook spokesperson said the company has not taken any position yet. In the past, Zuckerberg and his allies have taken similar steps.

It leaves us here: Zuckerberg does not fix Facebook or prepare anyone. That's the alternative we face.

Commentary quoted in the above section is the responsibility of the participants. Through the symbol in the national flag, help us keep communication with each partner that you think is inappropriate, by conveying ideas. If you do not agree with the comment Rules, Will be removed. Check in here control.

Welcome to our feedback service. We invite you to review, comment, and question the articles and reports published by El Diario. To maintain the best communication of our communication with all our users, we need to follow the following rules. By participating in the comment service you will receive the application of these rules.

You agree that you are fully responsible for the content you post.

It will not deliberately publish content that infringes copyright, trademarks, patents or any other intellectual property of a third party.

It does not affect the defamation, obscene or aggressive content that violates the rights of third parties for a municipality, state, federal, or international law, nor is it considered inappropriate. Passo del Norte Publications (*), its employees and the affiliate companies have published each and every demand (including those not limited to the fees of the lawyers). This will not write content that discriminates with other people, because of their gender, ethnicity, nationality, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, disability or any other category.

You acknowledge and agree that El Diario is not responsible for content published by third parties.
ചർച്ചാവിഷയമായ ചർച്ചകളിൽ El Diario പ്രസിദ്ധീകരിക്കപ്പെട്ട ഉള്ളടക്കത്തെ നിരീക്ഷിക്കുകയും രചയിതാവിന്റെ സമ്മതമില്ലാതെ ഒരു കാരണവുമില്ലാതെ തോന്നുന്ന ഉള്ളടക്കം നീക്കം ചെയ്യാനോ, എഡിറ്റ് ചെയ്യാനോ, മാറ്റം വരുത്താനോ ഉള്ള അവകാശം ഉണ്ടായിരിക്കും. ഒരു ഉപയോക്താവിനെ ഞങ്ങളുടെ സൈറ്റിൽ ഉള്ളടക്കം പ്രസിദ്ധീകരിക്കുന്നതിനുള്ള അവകാശം നീക്കം ചെയ്യുന്നതിനുള്ള ഞങ്ങളുടെ മാനദണ്ഡമനുസരിച്ച് ഞങ്ങൾ അവകാശം സൂക്ഷിക്കുന്നു.

ചർച്ചാ ഫോറങ്ങൾ നോൺ-കൊമേഴ്സ്യൽ ആവശ്യങ്ങൾക്ക് ഉപയോഗിക്കാൻ പാടില്ല.
ഇത് സാമ്പത്തിക വിഭവങ്ങളും പിന്തുണയും ആവശ്യപ്പെടുകയില്ല. ഇത് വാണിജ്യസംരംഭങ്ങളെ പ്രോത്സാഹിപ്പിക്കുകയോ ഞങ്ങളുടെ ചർച്ചാ വേദികളിലെ ഏതെങ്കിലും തരത്തിലുള്ള വാണിജ്യ പ്രവർത്തനങ്ങൾ നടപ്പാക്കുകയോ ചെയ്യില്ല.

ചർച്ചാവേലയിലൂടെ ലഭിക്കുന്ന വിവരങ്ങളുടെ ഉപയോഗം നിങ്ങളുടെ സ്വന്തം ഉത്തരവാദിത്തമാണെന്ന് നിങ്ങൾ മനസ്സിലാക്കുകയും അംഗീകരിക്കുകയും ചെയ്യുന്നു.
ഉപയോക്താക്കൾ പ്രചരിപ്പിക്കുന്ന ഉള്ളടക്കത്തെ ജേർണൽ ഒരിക്കലും അംഗീകരിക്കുകയില്ല, മാത്രമല്ല അതിന്റെ കൃത്യതയ്ക്ക് ഉത്തരവാദിത്തമുണ്ടായിരിക്കുകയും അരുത്.

നിങ്ങൾ പ്രസിദ്ധീകരിക്കുന്ന എല്ലാ ഉള്ളടക്കത്തിലും, എൽ ഡിയാരിയോ നൽകുക ലോകത്തിന്റെ മുഴുവനായോ അല്ലെങ്കിൽ ഭാഗത്തിലോ ഉള്ള ഉള്ളടക്കം ഉപയോഗിക്കാനും, പുനരുൽപ്പാദിക്കാനും, പരിഷ്കരിക്കാനും, സ്വീകരിക്കാനും, പ്രസിദ്ധീകരിക്കാനും, വിവർത്തനം ചെയ്യാനും, വ്യുത്പന്ന പ്രവർത്തനങ്ങൾ സൃഷ്ടിക്കാനും, വിതരണം ചെയ്യാനും, പ്രദർശിപ്പിക്കാനും പ്രദർശിപ്പിക്കാനും, പുനർവിതരണം ചെയ്യാനും, പുനരാവിഷ്കരിക്കാനും, അവരുടെ പ്രവൃത്തികളിൽ നിലവിൽ അറിയപ്പെടുന്നതോ പിന്നീട് വികസിപ്പിച്ചതോ ആയ ഏത് രീതിയിലും.


Source link