Wednesday , February 24 2021

Mistakes found in sea-healing study



Scientists have argued that the oceans of the Earth are claimed to have belonged to Earth, but their conclusions were misunderstood in the summer, rather than previously thought.

Corrections published by its authors have been published within two weeks after the high quality report on Nature. The work on scientists' work and the Scrips Institute of Oceanography, Oceanography, overcame a news story published on the website. The study, conducted earlier, found that earth oceans were added 60 percent more. The heat was worse than previously thought. "

"Unfortunately, we've been wrong here," Rolf Kayling said, "Schroeder is the weather scientist and co-author of the study." I think it's the key lesson for you to work as fast as you can to make mistakes. "

Keylining said the researchers explained the degree of uncertainty in their quantities. As a result, there are so many doubts that the era of the ocean is about to absorb the end of the paper's end to the heat absorption.

The conclusions of the study suggest that the energy of the ocean retains more energy than the earth's climate system does each year – similar conclusions are based on other studies. Despite the errors, it has not changed much. Keeling says that the authenticity of the authors means that the findings have a big difference. Researchers have more accurate than they thought.

"I take responsibility for what happened, because it's my part to ensure that such details are revealed," said Keeling.

The study was from Lower Regiment of Princeton University. Other researchers are China, Paris, Germany, the US. The National Center for Atmospheric Research and the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory.

"Keeping the accuracy of scientific records is one of the first as publishers, and we recognize our commitment to make the wrong changes in the papers we have published," the Washington Post said in a statement. "The problem with this paper has been brought to the attention of nature, which we take care of." We take up all the concerns relating to the papers we publish seriously and will release an update when more information becomes available. "

Questions rose

The original study published in October is a new way to absorb the heat on the oceans. Measurements of gas and gaseous metabolism, especially oxygen and carbon dioxide, have escaped from the ocean in the last decades and have led to hot air. They discovered that the heat was "at the top end of the previous figures," and suggested that global warming could speed faster.

The authors claim that Greenhouse spent less time than expected to prevent gas emissions. Notable media attention to study.

After publication, British researcher Nicholas Lewis published a long blog post that says he has found an important problem with research.

"As I can see, their method reduces uncertainty," Louis said in an interview on Tuesday, "About 30 percent is according to the Central Estimate."

By reading a lot of papers, reading a mathematical and physicist background, he said, "They look very carefully, they'll be meaningful." Where they mean – with these, it's obviously obvious – I look at them more deeply. "

Lewis has argued that the weather scientists are predicting more heat on their computer simulations, and in later studies and interpretations. Global warming over the current temperature is less than fear.

Although it is unclear whether the authors agree with Lewis's criticisms, Keeling said: "We agree that there are issues related to known issues."


Source link